- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Two Hunters Shoot the Same Buck, Owner Decided with Coin Toss
Posted on 12/3/14 at 11:55 am to AUTimbo
Posted on 12/3/14 at 11:55 am to AUTimbo
quote:
I'm kinda going with this thinking also. If you give the kid the deer he hasn't learned the importance of making a good shot on a deer. I understand the disappoinment for the kid but the father would have been teaching him a valuable lesson for the future this way.
What do you think of people using dogs to recover deer that had a bad shot on them? Isn't that kind of the same thing?
Posted on 12/3/14 at 12:01 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:were that shot and killed by someone else? If so, that would suck.
What do you think of people using dogs to recover deer that had a bad shot on them? Isn't that kind of the same thing?
Posted on 12/3/14 at 12:24 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
If it's a mortal wound and they have landowner permission absolutely...As long as it's not prime hunt time where they are going to screw up my hunt.
If you don't know where you hit the deer you probably shouldn't be in the woods.
If you don't know where you hit the deer you probably shouldn't be in the woods.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 12:29 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
What do you think of people using dogs to recover deer that had a bad shot on them? Isn't that kind of the same thing?
Not necessarily. Typically, people who use dogs to recover deer, and actually find the deer, it was a good enough shot to actually kill the deer, even though it ran, say 200+ yards. The shot the kid put on that deer was in the leg, and if that land owner did not shoot the deer than it would have died much later due to infection in the leg, with a much lesser chance of recovering the animal before the meat spoils.
The land owner shouldn't have been mad for the kid taking a shot on the deer. If I were him, I would have at least caped the deer and given the head and cape to the kid, maybe offer some of the meat.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News