- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wilson's own account about what happened on the day he shot Michael Brown
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:07 pm to Golfer
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:07 pm to Golfer
Semantics and rhetoric are ways to convey the truth.
He's story, the more I read it, the more it becomes questionable.
He had a month to seek legal counsel and to essentially stand before a jury. The path his narrative takes is all too familiar to me and one that can play on even our subtlest biases
He's story, the more I read it, the more it becomes questionable.
He had a month to seek legal counsel and to essentially stand before a jury. The path his narrative takes is all too familiar to me and one that can play on even our subtlest biases
3
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:10 pm to StrongSafety
You keep saying this, yet you haven't acknowledged any of the scientific evidence and eyewitness testimonies.
I'll ask this again....Do you think that the Grand Jury based their decision on Wilson's testimony?
I'll ask this again....Do you think that the Grand Jury based their decision on Wilson's testimony?
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:13 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
The path his narrative takes is all too familiar to me and one that can play on even our subtlest biases
like being biased against people that go for a police officer's side arm?
certainly Michael Brown's DNA and blood being on that weapon means SOMETHING to you doesnt it?
i agree with you that credibility of witnesses is one of the things that jurors have the hardest time with. but when the witness's testimony matches up almost perfectly with forensic evidence that cannot be swayed by "semantics and rhetoric," then even the most staunch Michael Brown supporter (that actually cares about things like scientific findings) must see that there is reasonable doubt all over this case and it would be nigh impossible to convict Darren Wilson of a crime in front of a petit jury
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:14 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
He's story, the more I read it, the more it becomes questionable.
Q1 What part of his story does not substantially match up with the physical evidence and the eyewitness testimony?
Q2 What do you believe actually happened? That Officer Wilson pursued Mike Brown and murdered him in cold blood?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News