Started By
Message

re: Why do most conservatives embrace a lack of evidence re: climate change but not religion?

Posted on 11/23/14 at 3:47 pm to
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71764 posts
Posted on 11/23/14 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Why be skeptical of climate change but not religion?


A lot of the climate change predictions failed to materialize.

Climate change isn't equivalent to religion in general. It's equivalent to Harold Camping. The world didn't end in 2011, so we can dismiss Camping as a prophet or a biblical authority. Or Pat Robertson--he said God told him a major hurricane would hit the US in 2006 and it didn't happen. We can dismiss him as a false prophet without rejecting Christianity.


Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46617 posts
Posted on 11/23/14 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

A lot of the climate change predictions failed to materialize.


To be fair, the same can be said of many religious prophecies. Muhammad, Jesus, Joseph Smith and Buddha all made statements about future events which failed to materialize in the given timeframe.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram