- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If you dropped Danny Woodhead into 50's/60's NFL, how good would he have been?
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:43 am to ehidal1
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:43 am to ehidal1
quote:He would have kicked everyones arse. The two all-pro running backs from 1955 were 5'11" 180lbs and 6'1" 190 lbs. Welker weighed in at 186. He would have been the same size of all the running backs back then, but faster
Woodheads value is more of a passing down guy (routes, blocking). Teams three a lot less then and even less to RBs. He is not a between the tackles kind of guy. He would be good but don't think a HOFer
Posted on 11/21/14 at 1:44 pm to lsupride87
If Woodhead were to have played in that era, then shouldn't we assume he would have been raised on that era's nutrition and workout regimes? Woodhead might have been playing at about 170lbs given his 5'8" height, and without the modern training he might not be quite so fast.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)