- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obamacare Appeal --- Jonathan Gruber doing more work
Posted on 11/16/14 at 2:42 pm to FalseProphet
Posted on 11/16/14 at 2:42 pm to FalseProphet
quote:
That same person said you couldn't take the 5th in a civil trial.
As I said, anyone can "take the Fifth".
But, at any trial such as the one that would have taken place in Halbig, what would Gruber have been taken the Fifth on???
I can see it now --
Attorney: "Mr. Gruber, as one of the principal architects of Odumbf*ckCare, you now claim that there was just a typo in the law. You've gone on several far left whackjob MSNBC shows to state that. But, here you are in 2012 -- before this was ever a judicial matter -- claiming that this portion of the law was written with a purpose to force states to set up exchanges? So, which is it?"
Gruber: I take the Fifth!
RIGHT!
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
Posted on 11/16/14 at 2:46 pm to MMauler
I don't know why people would or wouldn't plead the fifth. But, he could do it just because he felt like it with no other motive at all.
And, what judicial fact would they take notice of exactly in this case? The fact that there is a video where the purported architect of Obamacare says what he thinks the federal governments motive was?
What is the dispositive fact there?
And, what judicial fact would they take notice of exactly in this case? The fact that there is a video where the purported architect of Obamacare says what he thinks the federal governments motive was?
What is the dispositive fact there?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)