Started By
Message

re: We could have had Jarvis Landry in the 2nd.

Posted on 11/17/14 at 1:21 pm to
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
67023 posts
Posted on 11/17/14 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

I like the way you used statistics and analyzed their play to come up with such a brilliant conclusion




Me too. Compelling and rich.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30192 posts
Posted on 11/17/14 at 1:28 pm to
I still stick to my "We should have gotten Jordan Matthews". I was very happy we got Cooks, but I still wanted Matthews more just because of his college production, size, speed, and everything about him screamed #1 WR potential. Any other year, he would have been easily 1st round grade. Back to back years of 1300+ yards receiving with no one else on that Vandy team.

Currently, their production is about the same ~550 yards through 10 games.

The factor I'm considering is without Colston, we don't really have a wide receiver with size. Stills is 6'0 and Graham isn't a traditional receiver, but more of a mismatch piece against LBs/Safeties. I understand that we always had a speedy 'x' factor player (Bush, Sproles, and now Cooks), but we needed someone that had some size too. Matthews was that piece to me. Especially considering there were a handful of those "speedy" guys in the later rounds (Archer, Brown, DAT, etc) we could have double dipped.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram