Started By
Message

re: "Serial" Podcast Discussion Thread...SPOILERS

Posted on 5/19/15 at 4:49 pm to
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35252 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Not really. By itself, it doesn't prove anything. But when you look at all the circumstantial evidence against Adnan, it just adds one more log to the fire.
That's the thing though. Even if he did it, a lot of the evidence presented has either been shown to be false (track phone call) or it is unrelated to the murder in the first place (Hae's Diary).
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22365 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 5:09 pm to
But there is still plenty of circumstantial evidence to support the theory that Adnan was Hae's killer. Sure, take any one piece of evidence and you can cast a shadow of a doubt on Adnan's guilt. But put it all together and it there is plenty of evidence to convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt.

The evidence that is most compelling for me: The night before Hae's murder, Adnan calls her and two other girls that he's been "talking" to. The night of Hae's murder, after being contacted by the police about her disappearance, he doesn't bother to call her on his brand new cell phone - but he does call the other two girls. (or is this just more bad luck?)
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram