Started By
Message

re: Nail in Emmert's coffin: NCAA influenced Freeh's "independent" report on PSU

Posted on 11/12/14 at 5:38 pm to
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83642 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

Sandusky was not a employee of the University
quote:

Michael Bangs, the hearing examiner, wrote in the recent court filing that it was clear Sandusky controlled the way he worked, was able to come and go as he pleased, didn’t have to answer to anyone at Penn State and had no responsibility or obligation to the university — indications that he was not an employee after 1999.

Bangs also references the Freeh report, saying it “was based on significant hearsay and was mostly ruled inadmissible (for the proceedings), (but) was admitted in part to show it had found Sandusky had received 71 separate payments from Penn State between 2000 and 2008.”


Think I read that there weren't as many payments as mentioned(between 2000-08). But still, he was there, and paid. And isn't he still receiving retirement form PSU?

This post was edited on 11/12/14 at 5:40 pm
Posted by PSU2LSU
Oxford MS
Member since Apr 2011
3148 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 6:04 pm to
quote:


Think I read that there weren't as many payments as mentioned(between 2000-08). But still, he was there, and paid. And isn't he still receiving retirement form PSU?


He receives his pension from the State of Pennsylvania. The payments were as a independent contractor. He wasn't a regular employee. Either way neither have any bearing on the heinous crimes he committed.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram