- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obama's plan to save the internet draws bold reactions
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:38 pm to Korkstand
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:38 pm to Korkstand
It's pretty easy really.
If ISPs want to get rid of net neutrality, then their monopolies have to go too. I suspect giving ISPs this power wouldn't be so bad if there was real competition in the field. Some ISPs would sell the fact they have no fastlanes and consumers would have popower to demand that arrangement.
As of now, the monopolies aren't going away and therefore neutrality is a bad idea. You can't have both.
If ISPs want to get rid of net neutrality, then their monopolies have to go too. I suspect giving ISPs this power wouldn't be so bad if there was real competition in the field. Some ISPs would sell the fact they have no fastlanes and consumers would have popower to demand that arrangement.
As of now, the monopolies aren't going away and therefore neutrality is a bad idea. You can't have both.
This post was edited on 11/10/14 at 11:39 pm
1
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:21 am to Teddy Ruxpin
The net neutrality issue wouldn't be an issue in the first place if the supply of ISPs wasn't artificially restricted through prior government regulation.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News