- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pregant and not planning an abortion? The anti-womenists are after you, too.
Posted on 11/9/14 at 8:10 am to SpidermanTUba
Posted on 11/9/14 at 8:10 am to SpidermanTUba
a couple things
sometimes people make bad decisions in courts, that doesn't mean what happened here means the GOP is evil when it comes to abortions.
This opinion article is very bias. We don't know the backstory to many of these stories
I think the most important thing this shows is that there is a value people put on the life of a fetus. Neglecting your body when pregnant is a serious issue.
It's just like the double standard that exists in California and i think other states as well.
Murder a women who is pregnant it is double homicide
Use instruments to go inside the women and kill the fetus in her womb, completely legal, and sometimes funded by the state.
In one instance the fetus is a living human being deserving of rights if you kill a women who is pregnant they also say you killed the fetus inside and call it murder. But if you purposefully kill the fetus and no the mother it is not homicide. that is logically inconsistent.
sometimes people make bad decisions in courts, that doesn't mean what happened here means the GOP is evil when it comes to abortions.
This opinion article is very bias. We don't know the backstory to many of these stories
I think the most important thing this shows is that there is a value people put on the life of a fetus. Neglecting your body when pregnant is a serious issue.
It's just like the double standard that exists in California and i think other states as well.
Murder a women who is pregnant it is double homicide
Use instruments to go inside the women and kill the fetus in her womb, completely legal, and sometimes funded by the state.
In one instance the fetus is a living human being deserving of rights if you kill a women who is pregnant they also say you killed the fetus inside and call it murder. But if you purposefully kill the fetus and no the mother it is not homicide. that is logically inconsistent.
This post was edited on 11/9/14 at 8:14 am
2
Posted on 11/9/14 at 9:01 am to catholictigerfan
quote:
In one instance the fetus is a living human being deserving of rights if you kill a women who is pregnant they also say you killed the fetus inside and call it murder. But if you purposefully kill the fetus and no the mother it is not homicide. that is logically inconsistent.
I'm with you. I've bitched about this for a long time. We're always told that it's after a certain time in a pregnancy that this is enforceable.
I got a question for those that agree with my previous sentence. If a person is found destroying a house that is only one fourth built, half built or three quarters built, is he still charged with destroying private property?
Posted on 11/9/14 at 9:49 am to catholictigerfan
quote:
sometimes funded by the state.
lie
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News