- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why no penalty on Davis on the INT?
Posted on 11/1/14 at 11:47 am to sicboy
Posted on 11/1/14 at 11:47 am to sicboy
quote:
I'm sorry. As much as people loved watching players get murdered out there, I'm all for some sort of regulation against taking a guy's head off. Helmet under the chin should always be discouraged
Fair enough but some of the newer rules might as well prohibit anything but two hand touch football, especially when it comes to quarterbacks.
2
Posted on 11/1/14 at 12:19 pm to euquol
I think the general intent of these rules are good. It's just that the refs are allowed too much interpretation.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 11:57 am to euquol
quote:
Fair enough but some of the newer rules might as well prohibit anything but two hand touch football, especially when it comes to quarterbacks.
The blind-side block penalty is the first one that comes to mind. The guy is pursuing the play, but because of the angle you are on, you are not allowed to make a "legal" block because the hit may be too hard. Not only is it a bad rule, this is one of the most inconsistently called rules I have seen.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News