Started By
Message

re: Why no penalty on Davis on the INT?

Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:48 pm to
Posted by HeadChange
Abort gay babies
Member since May 2009
43842 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:48 pm to
It was definitely a cheap shot and I think the purpose was the make Graham disappear because "he's soft"

I really didn't expect him to come back in the game, and if he did, I was expecting a non-existent act. Little did I know...
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77649 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:52 pm to
I'm sure after last season, word has spread around the league to beat the crap out of Graham to take him out of his game.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16629 posts
Posted on 11/2/14 at 11:56 am to
quote:

It was definitely a cheap shot and I think the purpose was the make Graham disappear because "he's soft"


I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that Graham comes off the line over the middle to start most of his routes. If Calvin, Dez, Julio, etc were in the same position I would expect Davis and other LBers to take the same shot. You always want to try and get in the other WRs head; especially, if they are one of the better ones in the league.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram