re: Let's hear from those complaining about the Miles "offensive philosophy"

I love how I praise coach for being an effective coach and succeeding at many aspects of the game, yet point a criticism at one aspect or pitfall, and I'm a negatiger, a hater, and a rantard with a low FB IQ.

To defend his ability at the development of the QB position and almost present it as a strength goes in the face of almost every objective fan of college football. It's delusional. I don't even think Miles would label as one of his strengths as a coach. This by no means makes him a bad coach. I agree that mitigating mistakes is a wise move, and would never argue otherwise. You do what you have to do to win. I simply believe there is an easier way to win that going 9 yards over 7 carries LINK

Or running the ball 3 times in a series over and over and over. I prefer the run, and I think most LSU fans do. I think the pass opens up the running game. I am simply hoping and stating (once again-for those who ignore the over-arching comment I'm making, and choose to show no common ground) that this round of QBs should/can be developed a little quicker/better, and coach needs to call plays that help them. We can be a little predictable at times. I'm not arguing pass for the sake of passing, I'm arguing pass for the sake of a dominant run game. I saw improvement against Ole Miss, but there is still a way to go. As you said, this staff spends "20 hours a week" at it and we still are sputtering on offense. Accepting reality? Why don't you accept reality that Miles' offense could be improved with more QB development, and that it is not a strength of Miles' tenure. Russell/Flynn spent 2 years under different leadership, to negate that fact in their development is a little ignorant. As is the same story for Mettenberger.

Not expecting Miles to come out with a magic wand and have an "all world" QB. I do however, think there is more that could be done, as we are halfway through the year.