Started By
Message

re: CDC head slammed for blaming nurse infected with Ebola

Posted on 10/14/14 at 8:54 am to
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35497 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Right.
The problem being Intubation/Ventilation is not only NOT an AGP, it generates a sealed system preventing aerosol production/distribution. IOW it eliminates aerosol risk as compared to an unsecured airway.
From the CDC:
quote:

Although there are limited data available to definitively define a list of AGPs, procedures that are usually included are Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP), bronchoscopy, sputum induction, intubation and extubation, and open suctioning of airways.
I don't know about the dialysis, but I guess it could depend on the type and what procedures were followed. I would go with what the CDC says on it.

While knowing that intubation can be life saving, I can see why the CDC recommends against it. By that point an Ebola victim is probably too far gone anyway.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124400 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:08 am to
quote:

I would go with what the CDC says on it.
Just as you would "go with" an astrophysicist who says gravity on the Earth and Moon are the same. It's understandable on your part, but it doesn't make the answer any more right.

Observations made here regarding aerosolization in intubated vs nonintubated patients are not controversial. They aren't even debatable. I'd happily explain further when I've got more time, if you're interested.

The fact there is reference to OPEN suctioning at all in an ID setting is also interesting. I haven't seen open suctioning done in a US ICU setting under those circumstances in 15yrs.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram