- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Grand jury refuses to indict over botched SWAT raid that disfigured toddler
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:04 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:04 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
They should use them. If their information turns to shite, they're liable. They trusted the information. Saying "well, that was info from a CI" is just a way to sidestep liability.
Eta: I'd guess they coach CIs to cover themselves. "Did you see any guns? Well, could there be any guns? Could you say there are guns for us?"
Eta: I'd guess they coach CIs to cover themselves. "Did you see any guns? Well, could there be any guns? Could you say there are guns for us?"
This post was edited on 10/9/14 at 10:05 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)