Started By
Message

re: Rolling Stones or Beatles?

Posted on 10/15/14 at 10:11 am to
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29272 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 10:11 am to
the beatles wanted to be the stones
Posted by HeadyBrosevelt
the Verde River
Member since Jan 2013
21590 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 10:16 am to
quote:

the beatles wanted to be the stones


You sure about that, mon?
quote:


On July 26, 1968, Mick Jagger flew from Los Angeles to London for a birthday party thrown in his honor at a hip new Moroccan-style bar called the Vesuvio Club—“one of the best clubs London has ever seen,” remembered proprietor Tony Sanchez. Under black lights and beautiful tapestries, some of London’s trendiest models, artists, and pop singers lounged on huge cushions and took pulls from Turkish hookahs, while a decorative, helium-filled dirigible floated aimlessly about the room. As a special treat, Mick brought along an advance pressing of the Stones’ forthcoming album, Beggars Banquet, to play over the club’s speakers. Just as the crowd was “leaping around” and celebrating the record—which would soon win accolades as the best Stones album to date—Paul McCartney strolled in, and passed Sanchez a copy of the forthcoming Beatles single “Hey Jude/Revolution,” which had never before been heard by anyone outside of Abbey Road Studios. Sanchez recalled how the “slow, thundering buildup of ‘Hey Jude’ shook the club”; the crowd demanded that the seven-minute song be played again and again. Finally, the club’s disc jockey played the flip side, and everyone heard “John Lennon’s nasal voice pumping out ‘Revolution.’” “When it was over,” Sanchez said, “Mick looked peeved. The Beatles had upstaged him.”


Like.A.Baus.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
143127 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 10:17 am to
quote:

the beatles wanted to be the stones
and the Stones wanted to be the Beatles

Anybody interested in either band should definitely check out the Beatles vs. Stones book. I'm only on the third chapter or so but it's been very interesting.

In the words of one insider who knew both bands in the early days: "The Beatles were thugs who wanted to become gentlemen, while the Stones were gentlemen who tried to act like thugs".
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram