- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rolling Stones or Beatles?
Posted on 10/15/14 at 8:52 am to kidbourbon
Posted on 10/15/14 at 8:52 am to kidbourbon
quote:
This is the reason (an example, at least) for the proliferation of "Are Beatles Overrated' threads
Well, it's also the fact the Beatles are considered by consensus to be the greatest band of all time. That means, by definition, they can't be underrated. there's nowhere higher for them to be placed in the pantheon. If you do not agree they are the greatest band ever, which let's face it, is pretty likely, it means you think they are overrated. Also, no one has ever gone broke trying to topple idols. It's a rite of passage.
I still say the Stones are better, and now I need to read that book, but also, the two bands were doing something a little different. They weren't exactly direct competitors.
Posted on 10/15/14 at 9:02 am to Baloo
quote:
the two bands were doing something a little different. They weren't exactly direct competitors.
This is where I fall on the argument.
Both are all-time great bands, but are also very different bands.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News