Started By
Message

re: Are severly anti-gay people more likely to be gay?

Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:46 am to
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
43199 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:46 am to
quote:

But I hate that he felt the need to be so ardently anti-gay when he had a partner.

I think you are confusing 'anti gay' - which he was not - with "anti gay-activist" which he definitely was.

I am not anti religion - but I sure as hell am anti "westbury babtist.'

He was opposed to stupidity in whatever form. Since he was homosexual himself, he was definitely opposed to those who put him and others like him in a bad light with their political proclivities.

I wish more 'identity' groups would do the same. I would like for Muslims to be virulently opposed to militant islamists of whatever stripe.

I would like for blacks to be virulently opposed to the political shenagagins that have be so detrimental to their culture.

You referred to LAT as a coward, perhaps even evil, for his outspokenness. I say he was proudly brave and good for how he handled himself. He didn't whimper about his situation and stay in the shadows while others 'spoke for him' - nor did he follow the activist agenda when he knew that agenda was wrong.

He didn't try to hide anything. When I visited him back in 2006 or 07, he showed me photos of himself and his partner. I didn't ask him any questions about his situation or any conflicts he may have been dealing with, not because it was 'uncomfortable' but because it was just of no interest to me. He was my friend because of other shared interests - primarily politics and LSU alum.

Charles was a good man in every sense of the word, and I rise to defend him against all attacks, whether they are out of ignorance or not. I don't think you are malevolent toward him, but I think you are ill informed.
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
20946 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 10:46 am to
LAT had plenty of posts that could be construed as anti-gay at worst and outright insulting at best.

For example,

quote:

Gay men are men that for the most part are completely defined by what their dicks want and the "right" to be able to have as much sex with others because it is the "freedom of not being married to a woman and allowing those antiquated religious teachings stifle us and corral that sexual freedom."


LINK

That's dehumanizing a group of people, to say that "most" are like that. It's akin to saying most blacks are violent criminals. LAT had some nuanced views and was by no means a "basher," but let's not act like he didn't say some boneheaded things on the subject.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 10:59 am to
quote:

You referred to LAT as a coward, perhaps even evil, for his outspokenness.
This I didn't do. I mentioned it as something other people with similar issues are capable of.

A senator that makes laws against gay marriage and gets caught sucking a dick is basically an evil person.

I don't think that fits LAT at all. I'm glad he had someone, and I'm glad he had you. You seem like a good friend and person.
Posted by KeyserSoze999
Member since Dec 2009
10608 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 11:06 am to
quote:

I think you are confusing 'anti gay' - which he was not - with "anti gay-activist" which he definitely was.


very common as they try to put everyone in a box
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram