re: Veritasium's 13 Misconceptions on Global Warming...

quote:

---

the cyclic nature of climate change is directly related to the Malankovich cycle

and I know you know this Tigah

---

I'm aware of the theory. It accounts for elements of the pleistocene and holocene. But . . .



how did we switch between correlation with obliquity vs eccentricity cycles?

What accounts for the 50M-yr cooling trend?



Lastly, in the past, Milankovich Cycles accounted for temperature?
Yet there is a problem. CO2 correlated exactly with these fluctuations.

Theory has it that past fluctuations were due to solar input. The solar input variances are based on orbital and axial differences. However CO2 correlated exactly with the resulting terrestrial temperature increases. CO2 correlated exactly with resulting terrestrial temperature decreases. Odd indeed.

If CO2 is an independent climate modulator at our atmospheric levels, why the exact correlation during each cycle?



As you said, it's just a 6min video.
But you can see the general problem, no?