Started By
Message

re: Lindy's basketball annual/preview

Posted on 9/21/14 at 3:32 pm to
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9834 posts
Posted on 9/21/14 at 3:32 pm to
I'll list the West teams by totals..

Spurs- 51.5
Clippers- 51.0
Warriors- 51.0
Thunder- 50.5
Blazers- 50.0
Rockets- 48.0
Grizzles- 48.0
Mavs- 48.0
Suns- 47.5
Nuggets- 44.5
Lakers- 44.0
Kings- 43.0
Pelicans- 42.5
Wolves- 42.5
Jazz- 36.0


quote:

PG should get a 7.5 at least. His injury was a freak thing and only missed 5 games in 4 prior years


I could see that. An extra 1.5 would put them tied for 11th with the Lakers at 44.0. A team that got very kind rankings across the board..

I just kind of realized, by ranking 5.0-10, it kind of gives a win projection. So maybe it's projecting the Pelicans at about 42.5 wins.. that kind of makes sense..
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 9/21/14 at 4:40 pm to
Yeah I don't see how the Kings/Lakers and arguably the nuggets would be better.



Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22507 posts
Posted on 9/22/14 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Spurs- 51.5
Clippers- 51.0
Warriors- 51.0
Thunder- 50.5
Blazers- 50.0
Rockets- 48.0


These are unarguable


quote:

Grizzles- 48.0
Mavs- 48.0
Suns- 47.5
Nuggets- 44.5


We are in this group. I see as around the quality of the Grizz. The Mavs are old and could be solid or fall off. If Bledsoe isnt there the Suns will regress. and the Nugs depend on injury recoveries.


quote:

Lakers- 44.0
Kings- 43.0
Wolves- 42.5
Jazz- 36.0


We are way better than all of these teams.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 9/22/14 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Lakers- 44.0 
Kings- 43.0 
Pelicans- 42.5 
Wolves- 42.5 
Jazz- 36.0 


Wow. The Kings and Lakers rate better? The Kings rating is optimistic but not outrageous because Boogie. The Lakers score is a joke. Got to sell magazines I guess. The Wolves rating is rather dubious too

As for the Pels, C, PG and SG ratings should be higher. SF should be much lower. 42.5 is on the very low end, but it's fair. This is a 6 man team that has obvious flaws and question marks within that group. 42-52 is the range I see.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram