Started By
Message

re: You be the admissions director

Posted on 9/22/14 at 6:11 pm to
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39625 posts
Posted on 9/22/14 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

A school is NOT going to take an inferior candiate (no matter how they rank the kids) over a superior one.


Happens all the time at law schools admissions. The thing is it isn't the super superior student with the 180 LSAT that doesn't get an offer, it's the kid that is at the various low ends of the schools typical admission spectrum. Ie the lowest non diversity admission is 168 but the diversity selection is a 160. The jump can be pretty stark at that juncture.

Btw not sure if posted but you could make a "meritocracy" argument for a lower scoring individual. There is certainly "merit" to doing "more with less" but of course what is an acceptable lower accomplishment is highly subjective.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 9/22/14 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

The thing is it isn't the super superior student with the 180 LSAT that doesn't get an offer, it's the kid that is at the various low ends of the schools typical admission spectrum. Ie the lowest non diversity admission is 168 but the diversity selection is a 160. The jump can be pretty stark at that juncture.
The difference between a 160 and a 168 is far from stark. Half of that difference can be a single bad deduction in a logic game.

(And LSAT is a single component of the admissions matrix, one which in the rosiest of studies administered by LSAC is correlated at a .36 coefficient with first-year grades and drops to noise after that.)
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram