Started By
Message

re: Forbes Mag - Obama outperforms Reagan on jobs growth and investing

Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:34 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Member since Sep 2003
125553 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:34 am to
quote:

but the trends are similiar none the less.
When adjusted for LFPR they are not remotely similar. That's the point. What is it about that fact that you do not understand?

Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
113744 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:37 am to
quote:

When adjusted for LFPR they are not remotely similar. That's the point. What is it about that fact that you do not understand?


The liberal response to your graph: "The decrease in labor force participation is a good thing. It means people have more time to stay home and write that novel or take sculpture classes instead of slaving away to serve corporate greed."
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
65710 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:37 am to






FWIW
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
17327 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

When adjusted for LFPR they are not remotely similar. That's the point. What is it about that fact that you do not understand?


there are a lot of other factors that play in to in other than just LFPR. This recession was considerably worse on multiple fronts, including net job losses at the end as a result from the recession (double for recent recession compared to 80s).

Then add the cause of the recession, and what could be done to address it which were both different in both cases, and youre going to get different results.
This post was edited on 9/18/14 at 12:25 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram