- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Forbes Mag - Obama outperforms Reagan on jobs growth and investing
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:34 am to BobBoucher
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:34 am to BobBoucher
quote:When adjusted for LFPR they are not remotely similar. That's the point. What is it about that fact that you do not understand?
but the trends are similiar none the less.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:37 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
When adjusted for LFPR they are not remotely similar. That's the point. What is it about that fact that you do not understand?
The liberal response to your graph: "The decrease in labor force participation is a good thing. It means people have more time to stay home and write that novel or take sculpture classes instead of slaving away to serve corporate greed."
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:37 am to NC_Tigah
FWIW
Posted on 9/18/14 at 12:25 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
When adjusted for LFPR they are not remotely similar. That's the point. What is it about that fact that you do not understand?
there are a lot of other factors that play in to in other than just LFPR. This recession was considerably worse on multiple fronts, including net job losses at the end as a result from the recession (double for recent recession compared to 80s).
Then add the cause of the recession, and what could be done to address it which were both different in both cases, and youre going to get different results.
This post was edited on 9/18/14 at 12:25 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News