- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Man U reports record revenues-Interesting
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:34 am to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:34 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Then why did almost every club in Europe vote yes for it except basically City and PSG?
Just because it is slightly better than free for all spending doesn't mean it still isn't a joke.
quote:
Its designed to create some kind of competitive balance.
Only at the very top. Burnley and most others, even larger clubs like Sunderland will never have a chance to truly compete.
And it will never help the Celtic and 9 Patsies League.
quote:
Also designed to keep clubs from going under do to not being responsible with their spending
Valid point. It won't make the competition "fair", but this is at least a good step.
2
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:43 am to Tigertown in ATL
quote:
Only at the very top. Burnley and most others, even larger clubs like Sunderland will never have a chance to truly compete.
Burnley is an extremely small club who will never amount to anything. It is what it is.
Actually it could help Sunderland with a major factor being the size of their stadium.
Regarding Celtic. The SPL is a joke b/c 3 of its big clubs are in the 2nd division.
This post was edited on 9/10/14 at 9:43 am
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:48 am to Tigertown in ATL
quote:
Only at the very top. Burnley and most others, even larger clubs like Sunderland will never have a chance to truly compete.
I understand what you're saying and think there is value in it. This is the most common argument thrown out in opposition to FFP. But if this is being turned into a FFP thread, I would have to say that these types of clubs have never been competitive at the highest levels in any era, with or without FFP.
So, my question would be: how has FFP really affected the competitive balance of the game?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News