Started By
Message

re: Anchor

Posted on 9/4/14 at 12:12 am to
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 12:12 am to
quote:

I'm not sure why anyone would be against it.
This is what I'm hung up on. The change has absolutely zero effect on strategy, rankings, anything. Opposing the change based on procedural grounds is silly.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 12:14 am to
Well tomorrow please update us with a substantive reason for opposing the change, if any members opposing the change provide any.

I'm honestly curious.
This post was edited on 9/4/14 at 12:15 am
Posted by LaronLandry30
Jackson MS
Member since Jan 2009
29 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 12:17 am to
I see your point. And I'm not looking for support i appreciate the opinions and wanted to hear what y'all think. Another guy- seriously not me- mentioned winning by .4 last year and how it would have been different. So if it happened this year, the last minute change he disagrees with would have caused him a playoff bid
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 12:20 am to
His argument is that he would have missed the playoffs with decimal scoring last year?

He deserves to be laughed at.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram