re: Play Calling Response Thread

Why does A&M put up a lot of points? They play the spread. The whole point of their game plan is to outscore the opponents. Sometimes that makes it look like you're dominating i.e. 52-28, but a lot of the time when you're playing big boy SEC teams, especially LSU, it doesn't freaking work It's why LSU doesn't lose to A&M, and why A&M doesn't win the West.

It's because of what we play. We don't do it West Coast, we don't run the spread. We beat the shite out of people until we come out on top. We try to keep our offense on the field so the spread teams aren't on the field as long, and our defense shuts them down while they are. It's a better system. It's why Bama does it too. It means we don't always lead the whole time, it meas the wins won't be pretty, but they're wins. Ridiculously more often than not, the W is what happens.

Would I like to have a little more misdirection and play action? Sure. Would I like the TE's to catch the ball and Jennings to complete his screens so that the I isn't a one dimmensional formation? Sure. Would I like to see more designed quarterback runs ? Absolutely.

But it's the first freaking game for a young team, and if you don't think that Wisky was a damn good team you're wrong. That was a blueprint on how to beat LSU, a brilliant one. And they executed it, but they coudn't EXECUTE THE ENTIRE GAME. LSU outlasts. We are strong, and we know it.

Also watch that A&M game again. The SCar defense was not ready at all. There was NO communication. LSU would have scored on them almost as much as A&M, and SCar wouldn't have scored nearly as much on us.

So stop being the 4 year old who wants what the other kids have, because the shiny toys suck, I promise.

That's been my point for most the thread. But I'm still a "clueless idiot."

Basically that we need more variation than run up the middle.

quote:

---

In warfare, deception is one of the most valuable weapons. Grant knew it. Lee knew it. I don't think Miles knows it.

---

In warfare, power, intimidation, and shock is one of the most valuable weapons. That's why tanks were created. Stalin knew it, Hitler knew it, Patton knew it. Miles knows it.

Umm the fact that they went to a 3 WR set and Spread offense is what forced Wisconsin to change from their 3-4 to the nickel.

They couldn't cover our WRs in the 3-4, and they couldn't stop our running game in the nickel.

Thanks for proving my points. That basically changing up the offense is what lead to the comeback.

For the first 3 Quarters we pretty much only tried to run against the 3-4 and pass when it was necessary. Yet when we passed the ball on 1st and 2nd down we had a lot of success.

On our first Touchdown drive in the 4th.

LSU had 8 plays 59 yards of offense.
3(1 being a 4 yard sack) plays were passes for 63 yards.
You do the math of how well we ran the ball.

That was the drive that forced them to change from the 3-4 to the nickel. Which set up for Hilliard to go off the next drive for 3 plays 53 yards 1 TD.

Amazing how the passing opened up the run game.

quote:

---

orry I don't need to manipulate stats to make some stupid and irrelevant point while ignoring hard facts and using your eyes to see what actually happened in the game. Our offense sputtered in the first half doing what we thought we be our strength. Load up the box and go right at them. We adjusted. NO frickING shite.

I'm also sorry that LSU won. I can tell it's hard on you, because your vagina is bleeding over into your posts. Keep up the good work

---

BOOM

quote:

---

I'm also sorry that LSU won. I can tell it's hard on you, because your vagina is bleeding over into your posts. Keep up the good work

---

Many of these guys really do take wins too hard. This one was most likely very hard on them as the coaching staff let them rant and rave for a half only to dash their hopes.