Started By
Message

re: DNC Responds to Paul's WSJ Article

Posted on 8/28/14 at 2:29 pm to
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69955 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 2:29 pm to
The amazing thing is that this could have been a republican response to a democrat in 2004.

I have said it once and I will say it again. Anyone who voted for Lurch in 2004, but does not vote for Rand, is a huge hypocrite.
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32846 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 2:31 pm to
Damn DNC taking his right flank there

Bravo liars. Bravo
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35708 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

I have said it once and I will say it again. Anyone who voted for Lurch in 2004, but does not vote for Rand, is a huge hypocrite.
Does this go the same for people who voted for Bush in 2004 but are going hard for Rand Paul right now?
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

I have said it once and I will say it again. Anyone who voted for Lurch in 2004, but does not vote for Rand, is a huge hypocrite.

I'll go a step further. Assuming Hillary and Rand get the nominations, anyone who voted for Kerry and Obama because of foreign policy is logically incoherent if they vote for Hillary. Conversely, anyone who voted for W and McCain because of foreign policy is logically incoherent if they vote for Rand.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
85504 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

The amazing thing is that this could have been a republican response to a democrat in 2004.


You mean politicans swap arguments with each other depending on who is in power????????
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram