Started By
Message

re: DOJ admits Lerner emails do exist in backup

Posted on 8/25/14 at 2:35 pm to
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
35171 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 2:35 pm to
Wasn't there a Judge that ordered new testimony must be given under Oath and subject to perjury charges if found to be false? Where does that stand? Should be getting close to kickoff.

Hope abides.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

Hope abides.


Honestly, what are you guys "hoping" for? You all act like this is a football game. Cheering and booing.

Here we have a tweet that this woman's emails were backed up and we have 3 pages of dancing bananas.

If this woman ever had an actual conviction, this board would lock up from the frenzy.

And then what would you actually have? One government worker convicted of a crime.

There were 138 people in the Reagan administration investigated, indicted or convicted. Your head must have exploded from the excitement....

Or disappointment.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram