Started By
Message

re: Any positive, direct results of protesting in the past 40 years?

Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:49 pm to
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84927 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:49 pm to
quote:


but there is no point to get together in mass protest if you can't even create a message


there was a general message. it was a left wing response to the bailouts and general social inequality. it's tough to get too specific when part of the identity is that there are no leaders.

It could have, and i think almost did, turn into a liberal tea party (which is something you've lamented the lack of several times).

quote:

i agree 100% with what another (much older) poster posted about protests today: they're just trying to seem cool and like they have something to say/change


there are some people like that. at the end of occupy you saw about 60% of the people were just there to "be seen". but that doesn't mean every protester is like that nor does it necessarily detract from a particular message. I'm sure it was no different back in the day.
This post was edited on 8/18/14 at 5:51 pm
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

there are some people like that. at the end of occupy you saw about 60% of the people were just there to "be seen".

this has been the case for the modern era.

woman get really horny at protests. you cannot capitalize on this unless you are also protesting.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424224 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

I'm sure it was no different back in the day.

the biggest difference was that "back in the day" there was something to actually protest about
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram