- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Response to naysayers of ARMY Document leaked
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:37 pm to kilo
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:37 pm to kilo
quote:
Is it an active FM. Answer that question.
First of all, we have transitioned from the field manual. We now use a different naming convention for our doctrine. Try looking up ADP, ADRP, ATP and ATTP.
In regards to your question, are you referring to the document that is the focus of the article? ATP 3-39.33?
Do you know how to research? Then put that into Google and Army Publishing Directorate (apd.army.mil) as well and see what you get.
And enjoy the laughs.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News