- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Response to naysayers of ARMY Document leaked
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:29 pm to Clames
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:29 pm to Clames
quote:
Not an active FM.
Did not say it was. That was not the focus of the article. It was ATP 3-39.33. And since I can find it on adp.army.mil I know it is current Army doctrine.
As far as the read of your post, you are correct. It is open source information.
As far as the information regarding Title 10 of US Code versus Title 32, yeah, I kind of know just a little bit of it.
1
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:35 pm to Wolfhound45
My point was the nonsense hair-on-fire treatment of the OP and the attendant link relating to that ATP. I'm probably the only person on this board actively serving in a DSCA related TF so I'm always amused by those that seem to think DoD is just going to up and drop the hammer on US civilians.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News