- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: does the US need overarching strategy to confront Islamist terrorism?
Posted on 8/14/14 at 1:44 pm to wfeliciana
Posted on 8/14/14 at 1:44 pm to wfeliciana
While the obvious answer to your question is yes. It is a useless answer, and developing a strategy is futile until the U.S. defines the purpose, or objectives, the strategy is intended to achieve. Even Hillary Clinton recognizes that the U.S. under Obama does not have realistic purposes for its foreign policies. Don't do stupid stuff doesn't lead itself to developing effective strategies since it is a more reactive, rather than proactive, approach.
Posted on 8/14/14 at 4:26 pm to Poodlebrain
Poodlebrain: I'm assuming the overall goal is to reduce terrorism. You are right about HRC, this is her statement actually. I agree the obvious answer if yes, and that part of our problem has been no end goal and implementing strategy. What I'm fuzzy on is the containment and other components and how that would work. Thus my question.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)