Started By
Message

re: Dalton and Bengals agree to 6yr $115 mill extension

Posted on 8/4/14 at 10:01 am to
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6415 posts
Posted on 8/4/14 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Don't see how you could say Tannehill is better


Don't think the guy actually said Tannehill was better. Just that he'd take Tannehill over Dalton. And given the negligible difference in stats, I don't think anyone would say that's a crazy choice to make.

I don't know much about the Dolphins, but based on those stat lines, it's not obvious that Dalton is the better option of the two.
Posted by extremetigerfanatic
Denham Springs
Member since Oct 2003
5387 posts
Posted on 8/4/14 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Has he lived up to the #8 overall pick?


No he hasn't but that has nothing to do with this discussion.

What would you rather have?
Andy Dalton at 20/year

Or

Tannehill at I don't know guess 10/year (current rookie contract is 3/year) with 10/year left over to put people around him?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram