Started By
Message

re: Ebola scare. should we ALL be worried?

Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:14 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124638 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

It says are contagious whether the virus is present in blood, fluids, or organs.

That includes incubation, champ.
Where in hell are these guys getting the invincibility message?

Hell's bells, I haven't even heard that stupidity from Maddow yet.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:19 pm to
What's sad NC is he said he read the MSDs sheet and came to that conclusion.

Think about that, he read the right information, yet still retained false information. It's mind boggling
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Where in hell are these guys getting the invincibility message?


Low degree of communicability does not equal invincibility. They are two very different things. The disease has a kill rate of 60-90%. That implies that invincibility is not really a consideration. It's fricking lethal. It beats all but a few relatively exotic conditions.

Somehow, however, it has only killed (ETA: 2300) people since it was identified almost 40 years ago. 2300, in the most abject and assbackward conditions imaginable.

Gee I'm no specialist in the field, but my mind is led to certain conclusions--which are apparently backed by near-consensus in the medical community (including that Emory article you linked). High rate of lethality, low rate of fatalities, generally primitive protocols for quarantine (at least when it first hit the scene).

Maybe I'm not seeing the acorns for the trees or the forest for the grass. Or something.
This post was edited on 8/1/14 at 7:33 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram