- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Josh Gordon apparently barrrrrrrrely failed
Posted on 7/29/14 at 2:52 pm to wildtigercat93
Posted on 7/29/14 at 2:52 pm to wildtigercat93
wait whats the point of testing B if it doesn't matter?
this sounds like BS but i don't understand. Is there a lesser number for the B sample?
this sounds like BS but i don't understand. Is there a lesser number for the B sample?
2
Posted on 7/29/14 at 2:54 pm to SammyTiger
I think it just has to show up in the other sample.
Posted on 7/29/14 at 2:57 pm to SammyTiger
quote:Good point. If sample A was lower than the threshold but B was higher, do they just ignore the positive test?
wait whats the point of testing B if it doesn't matter?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News