Started By
Message

re: Marriage Equality Argument - Pretty good point

Posted on 7/28/14 at 7:23 pm to
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18842 posts
Posted on 7/28/14 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

Anderson employs a very similar argument that people did when slaves were claiming they were being denied rights.

Just substitute "personhood" with "marriage". "Well Mr. Slave, you are not being denied rights because you are not a person".

Or woman

"Well Mrs. Suffragette, you are not being denied rights because voting is reserved for men"



Did you listen to the video clip? He made no such argument.

The argument slaves were not people was on its face wrong and at the time it was made was recognized as wrong by most of the population. Simple science could prove that.

Marriage has been at its core a relationship of man and woman throughout history. There was a limited recognition of same sex relations but they were not recognized as marriages. Marriage was Man:woman.


This post was edited on 7/28/14 at 7:29 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69490 posts
Posted on 7/28/14 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

Did you listen to the video clip? He made no such argument.
He absolutely did. He claimed that no discrimination exists because the gay man has just as much of a right to enter into a marriage contract as a straight man. He is assuming that marriage has a concrete, timeless definition.

It is no different than pro-slavery folks saying that personhood has a concrete, timeless definition, and slaves aren't a part of it, so there is no discrimination.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram