- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St George organizers fail to get enough signatures for Nov vote
Posted on 7/23/14 at 12:03 pm to Asgard Device
Posted on 7/23/14 at 12:03 pm to Asgard Device
quote:
This is why SG turns so many people off. You're making shite up and spreading falsehoods to create the illusion that you are victims
Challenge accepted.
quote:
But Mary Olive Pierson, an attorney hired by the Mayor’s Office to handle annexation and St. George litigation, predicted that any election date could be postponed, saying the city-parish will file a lawsuit challenging the petition as soon as it’s filed.
“I can assure you there are going to be challenges to the petition which will have to be dealt with in the courthouse before they get to the voting booth,” she said. “I’ve never had much confidence in their predictions for a timeline for an election.”
LINK
Now you may not think its news or worthy of being posted here, but the Advocate did put this on their front page this morning.
Now we can argue about whether or not she is a "spokesperson" but everything I posted was true.
1
Posted on 7/23/14 at 12:17 pm to doubleb
Interesting.. and well played, sir. I actually like your posts in other topics so I probably shouldn't lump you in with sprocket and some of the mouth breathers that post on here.
I do think the petition should be challenged if legit technical reasons exist but I don't think they should block it just for the sake of blocking it. I was told by somebody from Kips camp that they don't think all the signatures are legit but if the people wanted it then they would only seek to protect the taxes that are used to serve the entire parish and their bonds. Basically not letting SG get off with getting infrastructure that will be paid for by the rest of the parish.
We shall see. I'm about to have less skin in the game when my parents sell their rental off Coursey blvd.
I do think the petition should be challenged if legit technical reasons exist but I don't think they should block it just for the sake of blocking it. I was told by somebody from Kips camp that they don't think all the signatures are legit but if the people wanted it then they would only seek to protect the taxes that are used to serve the entire parish and their bonds. Basically not letting SG get off with getting infrastructure that will be paid for by the rest of the parish.
We shall see. I'm about to have less skin in the game when my parents sell their rental off Coursey blvd.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News