- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Convention off the states.. all 50 now in play
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:30 am to Mr.Perfect
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:30 am to Mr.Perfect
quote:
I believe the 2nd ammendment should have said the people can have any weaponry available to the government without restrictions
The second amendment says nothing of the sort and thank god it doesnt... Do you think the second amendment allows or should allow citizens to have nukes? Drones? longrange missles? fighter jets?
2
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:33 am to petar
quote:
The second amendment says nothing of the sort and thank god it doesnt... Do you think the second amendment allows or should allow citizens to have nukes? Drones? longrange missles? fighter jets?
I think Scalia got it right in the most recent interpretation.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 11:27 am to petar
quote:
Do you think the second amendment allows or should allow citizens to have nukes? Drones? longrange missles? fighter jets?
Tyrants like the Kim family of North Korea have them. And nobody stops them.
But, let me toss it back to you - what right do you believe the Second Amendment protects, and how far do you believe that protection extends?
And "keep and bear arms" towards what purpose do you think was intended?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News