Started By
Message

re: Why is E.T. The most inaccessible film of all time?

Posted on 7/20/14 at 7:34 pm to
Posted by SirSaintly
Uptown, New Orleans
Member since Feb 2013
3142 posts
Posted on 7/20/14 at 7:34 pm to
I know what you're talking about. I assume it was about money of course. I remember E.T. being at the Lakeside I-IV theaters(not to be confused with Lakeside Mall theaters) for over a year. It was literally in theaters for over a year. That doesn't happen anymore at all and I can't recall a movie in theaters longer than E.T. Then I remember it being rereleased in theaters in the 80's again and it still made bank. I'm assuming there was no good reason for a vhs release when it was still making money at the box office. It did release on VHS in the late 80's. It was also rereleased in theaters in early 2000's too.

Read somewhere that Spielberg was earning $500,000 a day on his share of profits.
I have no idea why you don't see it on TV that much. Maybe keeping it "scarce" so as to keep rereleasing every 10 years or so? I have no idea really.
Posted by timbo
Red Stick, La.
Member since Dec 2011
7401 posts
Posted on 7/20/14 at 8:33 pm to
They followed the same strategy with E.T. that they did with a lot of the Disney classics: limited release on home video to keep it special.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68761 posts
Posted on 7/20/14 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

I know what you're talking about. I assume it was about money of course. I remember E.T. being at the Lakeside I-IV theaters(not to be confused with Lakeside Mall theaters) for over a year. It was literally in theaters for over a year. That doesn't happen anymore at all and I can't recall a movie in theaters longer than E.T.


I saw it at that theater in the one with the pitched roof on the end of the string of theaters.

How long was The Wall in theaters? I thought it was at that theater for more than a year.

Rocky Horror?
Posted by TU Rob
Birmingham
Member since Nov 2008
12784 posts
Posted on 7/21/14 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Read somewhere that Spielberg was earning $500,000 a day on his share of profits



Do you mean that he is earning $500,000 per day in royalties, or that his profits from the film are presently earning $500,000 per day? I might believe the latter. There's no way it is the former. Either way, it is very hard to believe he's earning over $180 million a year on ET earnings.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram