Sure...but no where in the OP did anyone suggest we needed to grade on a curve.

Based on what they did while at LSU, Les is clearly superior. WHY may be open for debate, but Nick only lost less than three games one time.

It's not even debatable. Les has been better while at LSU then Nick was while at LSU.

Anything else is either attempting to rewrite history based on current success at another program, or attempting to crystal ball a potential LSU career that never took place had he stayed based on the success he's had at another program. Both are wildly unfair to his successor (something that has dogged Miles since day one) and unnecessarily kind to Saban

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by TheBob

Metairie

Member since Jun 2005

16935 posts

Posted on 7/15/14 at 12:28 pm to GeauxTigerTM

quote:
Based on what they did while at LSU, Les is clearly superior. WHY may be open for debate, but Nick only lost less than three games one time.

Looking at the why is the only way to look at this situation logically. One replaced a coach who was fired. One replaced a coach that left because he received total control of an NFL franchise. Which situation do you think was better to walk into?

I'm not going to change anybody's mind, just like my opinion isn't changing. It doesn't matter.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by junkfunky

Member since Jan 2011

34002 posts

Posted on 7/15/14 at 12:32 pm to GeauxTigerTM

quote:
Sure...but no where in the OP did anyone suggest we needed to grade on a curve.

But hypotheticals are better, I love dwelling over what could be or could have been. I close my eyes to wash away the memory of the stains on the panelling in my trailer and I'm suddenly drinking a pina colada on a nude beach with a hot busty blonde.

0 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board