re: The latest on Global Warming

quote:

---

The modelers' attempt at a "counter-intuitive" argument seems to indicate that they are trying to have it both ways. If Antarctic sea ice continues to grow, it's due to global warming. If it diminishes, they'll quickly forget their "counter-intuitive" argument and say that any net melting which is occurring is due to warming.

---

You laugh, but that is the insanity that exists only in this field of research.

If one side supports your argument and the opposite also supports your argument, your argument is bullshite. You can't have it both ways. It makes zero scientific sense.

How can every path lead to the same outcome even when multiple paths are going in the opposite directions?

It literally leaves zero outlets to challenge the hypothesis, thus making it bullshite.