- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Some ????'s for lefties/greenies/GW supporters
Posted on 6/17/14 at 12:42 am to WeeWee
Posted on 6/17/14 at 12:42 am to WeeWee
quote:
Yeah. Many of them from such rock solid climate science journals such as "Iron & Steel Technology" and "Economics Bulletin". I'm not kidding.
again do you actually read and consider the arguments or do you just disapprove it because you dislike the publication, author etc.?
? That IS the argument. The 1350+ paper study by Popular Technology includes papers from journals that aren't even remotely related to climate science. Economists aren't qualified to speak as experts on climate scientists any more than the guy who takes your order at McDonald's.
This post was edited on 6/17/14 at 12:43 am
1
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:41 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Economists aren't qualified to speak as experts on climate scientists any more than the guy who takes your order at McDonald's.
Actually, the type of modeling economists do is the type that's most-closely related to the type climatologists do. Their input on the theory, assumptions, data quality, and forecast performance & uncertainty of mainstream-consensus climate models should all be very valuable.
Not that Economics Bulletin or whatever is anything close to a prestigious journal.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News