re: Sterling going for the knock out on NBA

quote:

---

I don't think you understand. The point being made is that Sterling cannot use legal discovery to uncover dirt on other owners because it is completely irrelevant. The fact that other owners may have said things in the past but those statements are not had an adverse impact on the league. That's the crux of the issue.

---

You don't seem to understand. The contractual violation apparently occurred when the NBA's image took a hit.

If Sterling's PI's discover information involving other owners that damages the NBA, will their ownership rights be in jeopardy as well?

You keep saying that if the other owners said things in the past, it isn't an issue because they didn't damage the league. Well, they didn't damage the league's image because no one knows about them.

What happens if they become known?

And this doesn't involve the courts. It involves public opinion.


In the end, I like this idea by sterling. It's interesting.