Started By
Message

re: Sterling going for the knock out on NBA

Posted on 6/13/14 at 1:15 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425819 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

The very fact that we don't know about any other statements proves the point.

the only point proven is that the public doesn't know about these (hypothetical) statements. just like the public didn't know about sterling's until the day they were released publicly

quote:

If Sterling's PIs find out that an owner made remarks, those remarks are made public, and there is a huge uproar over the remarks then the NBA could then get rid of that owner. But the PIs will have to be the ones to find it


uh, no shite

that's why they were hired
Posted by VOLhalla
Knoxville
Member since Feb 2011
4469 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

the only point proven is that the public doesn't know about these (hypothetical) statements. just like the public didn't know about sterling's until the day they were released publicly


quote:

uh, no shite


I don't think you understand. The point being made is that Sterling cannot use legal discovery to uncover dirt on other owners because it is completely irrelevant. The fact that other owners may have said things in the past but those statements are not had an adverse impact on the league. That's the crux of the issue.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram