Started By
Message

re: World Cup Viewers vs. Super Bowl Viewers (pic)

Posted on 6/12/14 at 9:57 am to
Posted by hoopsgalore
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2013
8657 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Considering the NFL is pretty muched only watched in the U.S., the viewership for the Super Bowl is more impressive.


The Super Bowl had an estimated 111.5 million viewers, yes? Though viewership is not out for the 2014 World Cup (obviously), Nielsen reported that the 2010 World Cup had an estimated 111.6 million viewers in the United States. That's a 22% increase from the 2006 World Cup, which was estimated to have 91.4 million viewers in the United States.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27337 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 10:01 am to
quote:

The Super Bowl had an estimated 111.5 million viewers, yes? Though viewership is not out for the 2014 World Cup (obviously), Nielsen reported that the 2010 World Cup had an estimated 111.6 million viewers in the United States. That's a 22% increase from the 2006 World Cup, which was estimated to have 91.4 million viewers in the United States.
How are they counting viewership considering the World Cup is a tournament and the Super Bowl is 1 game?

Is it total viewership during the whole tournament?

If so, that is comparing apples to oranges.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram