- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anti- science liberals vs anti-science conservatives: who is more dangerous?
Posted on 6/10/14 at 7:32 am to UPT
Posted on 6/10/14 at 7:32 am to UPT
quote:
There is no known planet in the universe that is in as steady of a state as Planet Earth,
I wouldn't think Mars, Mercury or Pluto would have changed greatly over time. Nonetheless, nothing we have done threatens the total existence of life on this planet anymore than what natural disasters have performed.
1
Posted on 6/10/14 at 8:41 am to C
Rachel Carson's book "Silent Spring" was shown to be full of flawed science. Many environment groups believe that their promotion of said "science" resulted in the movement's first major victory, the banning of DDT.
quote:
The legacy of Rachel Carson is that tens of millions of human lives – mostly children in poor, tropical countries – have been traded for the possibility of slightly improved fertility in raptors. This remains one of the monumental human tragedies of the last century.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News