- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: OT Lawyers: Road Home Property
Posted on 5/28/14 at 3:20 pm to Clyde Tipton
Posted on 5/28/14 at 3:20 pm to Clyde Tipton
I'm guessing Party A took Option One? Could they have gone back and changed to Two or Three? Of course, that would have been best done before the 2013 sale.
I'm still trying to figure out why Party B did this transaction.
I'm still trying to figure out why Party B did this transaction.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 3:21 pm to LSUFanHouston
Road Home has basically said that if Party B, C, D, etc. build a house on the lot and can show occupancy and insurance, then there are no issues and Road Home will release the covenants (regardless of Party A's previous noncompliance within the initial 3 year period).
This post was edited on 5/28/14 at 3:23 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)