Started By
Message

re: OT Lawyers: Road Home Property

Posted on 5/28/14 at 2:43 pm to
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38874 posts
Posted on 5/28/14 at 2:43 pm to
Seems to me Party A broke the conditions of the agreement for the funds. A lien or judgment should have been put in place in 2010 before it was sold to party B in 2013.

Curative action would have been required at that point to complete the 2013 sale.

Eta: The title company will get sued, but that's what they have insurance for, and that is exactly why you should buy title insurance.
This post was edited on 5/28/14 at 2:45 pm
Posted by Traffic Circle
Down the Rabbit Hole
Member since Nov 2013
4292 posts
Posted on 5/28/14 at 2:50 pm to
If Party A called Party C to talk about it, would Party B get jealous?
Posted by Spudly
Member since Jun 2008
1073 posts
Posted on 5/28/14 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Seems to me Party A broke the conditions of the agreement for the funds. A lien or judgment should have been put in place in 2010 before it was sold to party B in 2013.

Curative action would have been required at that point to complete the 2013 sale.

Eta: The title company will get sued, but that's what they have insurance for, and that is exactly why you should buy title insurance.


Yeah, this was my conclusion as well. No lien has been filed.

Already spoke to Road Home. They said that whoever owns the property is required to comply with the covenants. I don't really agree with them because the covenants seem to expire after 3 years.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram