Started By
Message

re: Haha Steve Meyers lost...

Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:05 am to
Posted by Pennymoney
Member since Sep 2012
667 posts
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:05 am to
quote:

So this means they reversed the decision that he can rent to non-married people (as in college roommates) right?

Yes
Which has nothing to do with Section 8.




It has everything to do with it. He's an A Hole of the 1st order.

He put those signs up to thumb his nose at the Southdowns community, and is so spiteful he's willing to drive his own property values down.

He's a Scumbag.

Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29508 posts
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:07 am to
quote:

He's a Scumbag.


The rich get richer....the mad get madder.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
102133 posts
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:08 am to
quote:

It has everything to do with it. He's an A Hole of the 1st order.

He put those signs up to thumb his nose at the Southdowns community, and is so spiteful he's willing to drive his own property values down.

He's a Scumbag.


He's certainly a scumbag, but this is the opposite decision you should hope for if you don't want to deal with section 8.
Posted by swampdawg
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2007
5141 posts
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:10 am to
So this ruling is in regard to single-family housing? I was under the impression that this was the reason for the Section 8 signs. If they aren't going to let him rent the houses to unrelated occupants, he intends to rent to Section 8 tenants.

So how does this affect the Section 8 part?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram