Started By
Message

re: Mall of La / BR General petition for Annexation into City

Posted on 5/5/14 at 7:33 pm to
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127023 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

I saw some statements that said that SG had revised their maps removing Celtic/Costco before the petition went out.

That makes sense. Thanks!

quote:

But that begs the question, why didnt they alter their annexation borders so they could prevent a Baton Rouge counter-attack?
My guess is they knew if the MoL was not part of SG their remaining tax revenues would not support a city so the incorporation would fall apart anyway. But that's just a guess.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23179 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

"The Celtic Studio/Costco area was not in their maps," Councilman Buddy Amoroso noted, "so this does not affect the new, proposed St. George at all."

A spokesman for the incorporation committee said organizers believed the businesses were already within Baton Rouge city limits, based on their interpretation of the law, so they never considered including them in the boundaries of St. George.


LINK
Posted by Lloyd Christmas
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2005
4283 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

My guess is they knew if the MoL was not part of SG their remaining tax revenues would not support a city so the incorporation would fall apart anyway. But that's just a guess.



The land grab/tax base grab that their plan evolved to is certainly proving to be their undoing.

A Shenandoah area incorporation probably would have accomplished what they wanted, with a slight property tax increase.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram