- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/22/14 at 8:45 am to a want
quote:
But they're charging for the rebroadcast!
WRONG! The customer owns the antenna! The custoner is paying Aereo to maintain his antenna. The customer's antenna that he owns is sending the signal to HIS OWN device. It's his antenna, his device. Do you get it now?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 10:06 am to a want
"But they're charging for the rebroadcast!"
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I don't think it's so clear. The networks have the right to a chunk of the spectrum to broadcast their signals, but in return, I believe their broadcasts have to be free. of course, this all started long ago when the technology was vastly different, but if you think of this in terms of the chip (being rented) functioning like the old antennas that used to sprout from all of the houses when I was a kid, it starts not to look like a "rebroadcast" at all. What if the technology gets to the point where you don't even need the relay from the roof, just the chip/antenna in the computer? Where would the "re" in "rebroadcast" be then?
A fascinating example of just how confusing government regulation can get as technology changes.
The funny thing is that we have too damn many laws, generally, but in a difficult, emerging area where new laws might actually make sense, we don't get them.![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I don't think it's so clear. The networks have the right to a chunk of the spectrum to broadcast their signals, but in return, I believe their broadcasts have to be free. of course, this all started long ago when the technology was vastly different, but if you think of this in terms of the chip (being rented) functioning like the old antennas that used to sprout from all of the houses when I was a kid, it starts not to look like a "rebroadcast" at all. What if the technology gets to the point where you don't even need the relay from the roof, just the chip/antenna in the computer? Where would the "re" in "rebroadcast" be then?
A fascinating example of just how confusing government regulation can get as technology changes.
The funny thing is that we have too damn many laws, generally, but in a difficult, emerging area where new laws might actually make sense, we don't get them.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 4/22/14 at 11:12 am to a want
quote:No, they are charging for the antenna and other gear that allow me to receive a free signal and redisplay it on supported devices.
But they're charging for the rebroadcast!
That's a valuable service which does not infringe on copyrights of the original FREE broadcasts.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)